SOCRATES: My goodness, this is exciting news.
I think I have finally found proof that God does not exist.
I thought I had good reason to deny the existence of God, but you refuted my argument and concluded that the most I can say is that I don't know whether or not God exists. Since then I have been reading through some philosophy websites. After our last discussion I found myself perplexed. PAUL: I have been thinking about our frequent discussions about God. To what do I owe the honor of this unexpected visit? The following is a recollection of our dialogue. We sat together for the afternoon to examine his proof. As it happens, he found his proof on the Stanford University Philosophy webpage. He was most excited to share his proof that God does not exist.
Roving Philosophical Report (Seek to 4:30): Rujun Shen hits the streets of Berkeley to find out whether people believe in God or not, and what their reasons for doing so are.My wonderful friend, Paul, visited me yesterday.In response to the existence of this God, a variety of responses and perspectives arise that allow the listener to really explore the nature of His existence, if He does exist at all. This is the God most familiar to Western society, and the God to whom the most consideration is brought, to determine whether or not it is plausible that He should exist. The all knowing, all-powerful, infinitely merciful and benevolent God that exists outside of space and time, as we know Him today, is the focus of the later conversation during this episode. Sinnott-Armstrong doubts that any of these are real reasons. Lastly, John mentions the defense that occurs through revelation. Another approach is through personal experience, where someone claims to simply have a feeling about God. The second thought is that given the way the world is, it could not have been the result of an accident, and this defines the argument from design. The first is the a priori ontological defense of God, which is completely logic based. John identifies a number of defenses of the existence of God. The guest on the show, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, introduces the idea that there are necessary components needed to establish a God of the traditional sort, which restrict what God can be like. The belief in God.is it something that is reasonable, something that can be defended by proof and evidence? Or is it something that must be accepted solely on faith, irreducible to logic? John notes that there are many different conceptions of God, some of which are more believable than others.
0 kommentar(er)
